D.C. Attorney General Proposes Tougher Breach Notification Laws
Washington D.C. Attorney General Karl. A. Racine is looking to strengthen data breach notification laws to provide greater protection for D.C. residents when their personal information is exposed in a data breach.
On March 21, 2019, Attorney General Racine introduced the Security Breach Protection Amendment Act, which expands the definition of personal information that warrants notifications to be sent to consumers in the event of a data breach.
Currently laws in the District of Columbia require breach notifications to be sent if there has been a breach of Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, or financial information such as credit and debit card numbers.
If passed, the Security Breach Protection Amendment Act will expand the definition of personal information to include taxpayer ID numbers, genetic information including DNA profiles, biometric information, passport numbers, military Identification data, and health insurance information.
Attorney General Racine said one of the main reasons why the update was required was to better protect state residents from breaches similar to the one experienced by Equifax. That breach affected 143 million individuals globally and 350,000 D.C. residents.
Additionally, the Security Breach Protection Amendment Act requires companies that collect, own, license, handle, or otherwise possess the ‘personal information’ of District residents to implement safeguards to ensure personal information remains private and confidential.
The Security Breach Protection Amendment Act also requires companies to explain to consumers the types of information that have been breached and the steps consumers can take to protect their identities, including the right to place a security freeze on their accounts at no cost.
In the event of a breach of Social Security numbers, companies would be required to offer a minimum of two years membership to identity theft protection services free of charge. The D.C. attorney general would also need to be notified about a breach of personal information, although the timescale for doing so is not stated in the bill.
Violations of the Security Breach Protection Amendment Act would be considered a violation of the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act and could attract a significant financial penalty.
This is not the first time that Attorney General Racine has sought to increase protections for consumers in the event of a data breach. A similar bill was introduced in 2017 but it failed to be passed by the D.C Council.
The Security Breach Protection Amendment Act must first be approved by the Mayor and D.C. Council, then it will be passed to Congress which will have 30 days to complete its review.
The update follows similar amendments that have been proposed in several states and territories over the past few months. While the updates are good news for Americans whose sensitive information is exposed, the current patchwork of state laws can be complicated for businesses, especially those that operate in multiple states.
What is needed is a federal breach notification law that standardizes data breach notification requirements and uses a common definition for ‘personal information’. Such a bill has been proposed in the House and Senate on three occasions in the past three years, but each time it has failed to be passed and signed into law.