25% off all training courses Offer ends May 29, 2026
View HIPAA Courses
25% off all training courses
View HIPAA Courses
Offer ends May 29, 2026

The HIPAA Journal is the leading provider of HIPAA training, news, regulatory updates, and independent compliance advice.

HHS-OIG Fines Two Healthcare Providers for EMTALA Violations

The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) has entered into settlement agreements with two healthcare providers to resolve alleged violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), commonly known as the patient dumping statute.

EMTALA requires hospitals to provide emergency care to anyone seeking treatment, regardless of their ability to pay. When a patient presents at a hospital emergency department, they must undergo an appropriate medical screening examination by a qualified medical professional to determine if they have an emergency medical condition, and stabilizing care must be provided. Organizations found to have violated EMTALA can face stiff financial penalties and, potentially, exclusion from federally funded healthcare programs.

Baptist Medical Center South (Baptist), in Montgomery, Alabama, was alleged to have failed to provide an appropriate medical screening examination and/or stabilizing treatment on three occasions. The first instance was in October 2020 when a patient was brought in by ambulance after being found by law enforcement preparing to jump off a bridge. The patient had a history of bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia. Baptist ordered a psychiatric consultation, and staff performed a suicide risk assessment and categorized the patient as high risk. Suicide interventions were initiated, including 1:1 observation, and without having received the ordered the psychiatric consultation, the patient eloped.

In May 2021, a patient presented at the Baptist ED via ambulance after being found unresponsive in a parking lot. A physician diagnosed the patient with acute psychosis and ordered a psychiatric consultation. Prior to receiving a psychiatric examination, the patient left the ED Against Medical Advice (AMA), but was not informed of the risks and consequences of leaving AMA nor did the staff take steps to determine the patient’s mental capacity.

HHS OIG Exclusions List
What You Need To Know

Get The 6 Essentials Checklist For Compliance Officers

A link to your download will be sent to your email address

Your Privacy Respected

HIPAA Journal Privacy Policy

In May 2021, a third patient presented to the ED who had plans to overdose. She was diagnosed with suicidal ideations and depression, had a history of bipolar disorder and alcohol abuse, and had attempted suicide in the past. The patient was categorized as high risk after a suicide risk assessment and a drug screen returned a positive result for a controlled substance. The on-call psychiatrist recommended inpatient treatment, and the patient was given Celexa around 24 hours later and left the hospital 90 minutes later AMA before any stabilizing treatment could be provided. Staff did not determine if the patient had the capacity to decide to leave AMA. HHS-OIG determined that each case violated EMTALA and settled the alleged violations with Baptist for $290,000.

Presence Chicago Hospitals Network dba Ascension Resurrection in Chicago, Illinois, was investigated over an incident in April 2023. A patient presented to the Emergency Department with chest pain, nausea, and vomiting. The patient’s insurance information was obtained; however, Resurrection failed to obtain an EKG, perform a pain assessment, and obtain a medical history. The patient was triaged and sent to the waiting area, waited an hour, then left without having received a medical screening examination to seek care at a different hospital. At the second hospital he was diagnosed with a ST-elevation myocardial infarction, an emergency medical condition. The settlement agreement included a $133,420 penalty.

Author: Steve Alder is the editor-in-chief of The HIPAA Journal. Steve is responsible for editorial policy regarding the topics covered in The HIPAA Journal. He is a specialist on healthcare industry legal and regulatory affairs, and has 10 years of experience writing about HIPAA and other related legal topics. Steve has developed a deep understanding of regulatory issues surrounding the use of information technology in the healthcare industry and has written hundreds of articles on HIPAA-related topics. Steve shapes the editorial policy of The HIPAA Journal, ensuring its comprehensive coverage of critical topics. Steve Alder is considered an authority in the healthcare industry on HIPAA. The HIPAA Journal has evolved into the leading independent authority on HIPAA under Steve’s editorial leadership. Steve manages a team of writers and is responsible for the factual and legal accuracy of all content published on The HIPAA Journal. Steve holds a Bachelor’s of Science degree from the University of Liverpool. You can connect with Steve via LinkedIn or email via stevealder(at)hipaajournal.com

x

Is Your Organization HIPAA Compliant?

Find Out With Our Free HIPAA Compliance Checklist

Get Free Checklist