Share this article on:
The CyberPeace Institute has released new data on cyberattacks on the healthcare industry. According to the latest figures, 295 cyberattacks are known to have been conducted on the healthcare sector in the past 18 months between June 2, 2020, and December 3, 2021. The attacks have been occurring at a rate of 3.8 per week and have occurred in 35 countries.
Those attacks include 263 incidents that have either been confirmed as ransomware attacks (165) or are suspected of involving ransomware (98), with those attacks occurring in 33 countries at a rate of 3.4 incidents a week. Over the past 18 months, at least 39 different ransomware groups have conducted ransomware attacks on the healthcare sector. Those attacks have mostly been on patient care services (179), followed by pharma (35), medical manufacturing & development (26), and other medical organizations (23).
The CyberPeace Institute studied darknet publications, correspondence with ransomware gangs, and interviews and identified 12 ransomware groups that had stated they would not conduct attacks on the healthcare sector during the pandemic, yet still continued to attack healthcare organizations, with at least six of the 12 having conducted attacks on hospitals.
The definition of healthcare used by the gangs differs from what many people would assume to be healthcare. For instance, while all 12 of the ransomware gangs said they would not attack hospitals, many used vague terms to describe healthcare, such as medical organizations. While that may suggest all healthcare was off-limits, many of the gangs considered the pharmaceutical industry to be fair game, since pharma companies were said to be profiting from the pandemic.
Three ransomware operations admitted mistakes had been made and healthcare organizations had been attacked in error. They said publicly that when a mistake is made, the keys to decrypt files would be provided free of charge. However, there were cases where there was some dispute about whether an organization was included in the gangs’ definitions of exempt organizations.
It should be noted that when an attack occurs and files are encrypted, the damage is already done. Even if the keys to decrypt data are provided free of charge, the attacked organizations still experience disruption to business operations and patient services. The process of restoring data from backups is not a quick process and attacked organizations still have to cover extensive mitigation costs. 19% of attacks have been confirmed as resulting in canceled appointments, 14% saw patients redirected, and 80% have involved the exposure or a leak of sensitive data.
The CyberPeace Institute said some threat actors have specifically targeted the healthcare sector. One example provided was a member of the Groove ransomware operation who was actively seeking initial access brokers who could provide access to healthcare networks. The Groove ransomware operation had the highest percentage of healthcare targets than other sectors based on its data leak site.
Data from Mandiant have revealed 20% of ransomware victims are in the healthcare sector, suggesting the industry is being extensively targeted. The FIN 12 threat actor is known to target the healthcare sector, and ransomware operations such as Conti, Pysa, and Hive have high percentages of healthcare organizations in their lists of victims (4%, 9%, and 12% respectively).
While there has been some targeting of the healthcare sector, many ransomware gangs use spray and pray tactics and indiscriminately conduct attacks that result in healthcare organizations being attacked along with all other industry sectors. These attacks often involve indiscriminate phishing campaigns, attacks on Remote Desktop Protocol, (RDP), or brute force attacks to guess weak passwords.
“Regardless of whether the targeting of healthcare organizations is by mistake, design, or indifference, ransomware operators are acting with impunity and are de facto defining what organizations constitute legitimate targets and what is off-limits,” concluded the CyberPeace Institute. “Their simplistic distinctions ignore the complexities and interconnectedness of the healthcare sector, in which attacking pharmaceuticals during a pandemic can have an equally devastating human impact as attacking hospitals.”